Your examples actually reinforce something I think we agree on: these engines appear to be quite tolerant of adjacent viscosities. A Camry making it to over 200,000 miles on a mix of 0W-20, 5W-20, and 5W-30 is impressive, but to me it demonstrates the robustness of the engine more than the...
I'm all for looking at the numbers. That's exactly why I don't think one UOA can answer the question.
If one 0W-20 analysis shows elevated wear, there are dozens of possible explanations besides viscosity—engine break-in, driving conditions, contamination, fuel dilution, sampling variation, OCI...
That's a fair point, and I don't think anyone is arguing that 5W-30 is "too thick" for this engine. Toyota itself approves it in other markets.
The question isn't whether the engine can run 5W-30—it clearly can.
The question is whether switching from the North American recommendation to 5W-30...
I agree that Toyota doesn't present 5W-30 as some catastrophic choice that will immediately damage the engine or void the warranty. The manuals clearly show the engine is capable of operating on a range of viscosities depending on the market.
Where I'd make one clarification is your last point...
I agree.
I think we've probably reached the point where we're just going in circles. (well, maybe 18 pages ago) :p
There seems to be broad agreement that Toyota approves multiple viscosities globally and that 0W-20, 5W-20, and 5W-30 can all be acceptable depending on the market and operating...
I'm not telling anyone what oil they have to use.
I've said repeatedly that if someone wants to run 5W-30 or 0W-30 within Toyota's globally approved viscosity range, that's their decision.
What I've challenged are the conclusions being drawn from the data.
I have no issue with people posting...
The same thing that guides a lot of owner decisions that fall within an acceptable range: risk tolerance.
Some people change oil every 5,000 miles instead of 10,000. Some use premium fuel when regular is permitted. Some replace transmissions fluid earlier than the maintenance schedule.
Those...
I completely agree that CAFE may influence Toyota's North American viscosity recommendation. I've never argued that fuel economy regulations play no role in these decisions.
Where I think we still differ is that proving CAFE influences the recommendation does not automatically prove that 5W-30...
Honestly, this is one of the more rational takes in the thread.
You're acknowledging that it's a personal choice based on climate, operating conditions, and your own comfort level rather than claiming Toyota got it wrong.
I don't have any issue with that position.
Where I've pushed back is...
Because "not required everywhere" and "superior everywhere" are two completely different things.
I've never argued that 0W-20 is the only oil this engine can run. In fact, the global Toyota charts clearly show otherwise.
What I keep challenging is the assumption that because Toyota permits...
The funny part is that you actually help me prove my point.
If we need a controlled dyno test and teardown to know for sure, then we're probably not as certain about 5W-30's superiority as some people in this thread pretend to be.
I'll watch it, but even if the conclusion is correct for a Duramax, that's still a Duramax-specific conclusion.
That's actually been my point throughout this thread.
The fact that one manufacturer, one engine family, or one application benefits from a different viscosity doesn't automatically...
I don't think that's a silly stance at all.
The V35 issue may have nothing to do with the T24A-FTS mechanically, but it certainly reminds owners that warranty support matters.
If someone wants to stay with the specified viscosity until they're out of warranty, that's a perfectly rational...
I currently own 10 vehicles, most of them Toyotas, and I’ve been surprised to find that the dealership is often the least expensive place to buy a battery. On the other hand, for higher-priced parts, I’ve found that ordering online and having them shipped to Omaha is usually cheaper than buying...
If the Supra on 0W-20 were experiencing widespread lubrication-related failures while BMW versions survived on 5W-30, that would be meaningful evidence. But simply having different factory recommendations for the same engine family doesn’t automatically establish superiority one way or the other.
Nobody said 0W-20 is “too thick to fit through passages.” That’s just a caricature of the argument.
The point has always been that modern engines are engineered and validated around specific oil characteristics — flow, pressure behavior, film strength, startup performance, VVT operation, fuel...
I think we’re actually closer in position than you realize.
I’ve never said people “can’t” run thicker oil. I’ve repeatedly acknowledged the engine is clearly capable of operating across a viscosity range. If someone prefers running 0W-30 or 5W-30 for peace of mind under heavy load or heat...
Because Toyota clearly believes the engine is capable of operating across a range of adjacent viscosities depending on regional priorities, climate assumptions, fuel economy targets, oil availability, and operating expectations.
I’ve never disputed that.
What I keep disputing is the conclusion...
Some posters absolutely have implied that — either directly or indirectly — by repeatedly framing 0W-20 as a CAFE-driven compromise sitting dangerously close to inadequate.
That’s very different from simply saying:
“Toyota allows multiple viscosities globally.”
I’ve already acknowledged the...