Sponsored

JLD94

Well-known member
First Name
JD
Joined
Jan 13, 2022
Threads
22
Messages
311
Reaction score
157
Location
Tx
Vehicle(s)
2013 Honda Accord, 2014 Nissan Rogue
I would hope it beats the current V6 in MPG. Given that the Tundra added about 5 MPG in both City and Highway numbers when it came out, I would think we could expect similar numbers.

My guess is 21/27 for the non hybrids, and the hybrid to be 23/27. Hopefully I'm wrong and it's even better but that's my 'realistic' guess.
 

lrtexasman

Well-known member
First Name
Larry
Joined
Mar 22, 2023
Threads
1
Messages
45
Reaction score
28
Location
Rockwall, Texas
Vehicle(s)
2023 Tundra
I would hope it beats the current V6 in MPG. Given that the Tundra added about 5 MPG in both City and Highway numbers when it came out, I would think we could expect similar numbers.

My guess is 21/27 for the non hybrids, and the hybrid to be 23/27. Hopefully I'm wrong and it's even better but that's my 'realistic' guess.
I think you’re close. I’d say 21/25 and hybrid 23/26
 

chounder

Active member
First Name
Jay
Joined
May 3, 2023
Threads
3
Messages
41
Reaction score
39
Location
Oregon
Vehicle(s)
Honda Pilot
My hope would be in the high 20s! They'll have a hell of an edge over the competition with some killer MPG ratings.
 

MJE

Well-known member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Jan 24, 2023
Threads
0
Messages
70
Reaction score
42
Location
Calgary, AB
Vehicle(s)
2022 Ford Bronco Sport
If they got this thing into the high 20s that would be an amazing win! I wouldn’t expect it to beat the RX500H at 27/28/27, but if it came close to that for a pickup would be pretty amazing! Ok obviously the Maverick hybrid in a FWD form does a lot better. But high 20s here I think would be awesome!
 

Mrknowitall

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 13, 2022
Threads
0
Messages
136
Reaction score
108
Location
SE MI
Vehicle(s)
20 Silverado, 14 JKUR
If they got this thing into the high 20s that would be an amazing win! I wouldn’t expect it to beat the RX500H at 27/28/27, but if it came close to that for a pickup would be pretty amazing! Ok obviously the Maverick hybrid in a FWD form does a lot better. But high 20s here I think would be awesome!
The Maverick is both low and light- that helps immensely. Aero on the RX is better thsan the Tacoma will be. but weight will be close.
 

JLD94

Well-known member
First Name
JD
Joined
Jan 13, 2022
Threads
22
Messages
311
Reaction score
157
Location
Tx
Vehicle(s)
2013 Honda Accord, 2014 Nissan Rogue
Grand Highlander numbers are out now. Base 2.4T will be 21/28. Hybrid Max 26/27.... and regular Hybrid which will not be in the Tacoma 37/34 for XLE, 35/31 for Limited.

All pretty impressive numbers for such a large vehicle. I still think Tacoma will be 21/27 and 23/27. I hope it's a little better than Irtexasman is predicting. ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: MJE

Jstryker

Member
First Name
John
Joined
May 12, 2023
Threads
0
Messages
9
Reaction score
13
Location
Bay area, Ca
Vehicle(s)
Tacoma 24
I think you’re close. I’d say 21/25 and hybrid 23/26

Im all in for the hybrid... but the inner voice in my head is thinking bad things... like now we have the expense of replacing the batteries every what 150k miles or 15 years which ever comes first for an additional 1-3 mpg in fuel economy advantage? I mean at least give us the PHEV option like the RAV4 Prime - then hell I'd knock over a bank for it.
 

JLD94

Well-known member
First Name
JD
Joined
Jan 13, 2022
Threads
22
Messages
311
Reaction score
157
Location
Tx
Vehicle(s)
2013 Honda Accord, 2014 Nissan Rogue
Im all in for the hybrid... but the inner voice in my head is thinking bad things... like now we have the expense of replacing the batteries every what 150k miles or 15 years which ever comes first for an additional 1-3 mpg in fuel economy advantage? I mean at least give us the PHEV option like the RAV4 Prime - then hell I'd knock over a bank for it.
I remember recently seeing Toyota advertise the 150K warranty on the batteries.... in Texas but maybe I was just seeing it on the internet and didn't realize it only applied to certain states.

"Hybrid Battery Warranty of 120 months/150,000 miles applies to these CA Emission states: CA, CT, ME, MD, MA, NJ, NY, OR, RI and VT"
 

Cavemold

Well-known member
First Name
Cavemold
Joined
May 18, 2023
Threads
4
Messages
82
Reaction score
65
Location
CA
Vehicle(s)
Ford Maverick 2022 Eco 2.0
As far numbers are concern it will need be 24-26 range to justify the price hike in my opinon its time for Tacoma to be efficient fuel wise. even if it cost pretty penny. That's the first thing people bring up when they talk about tacoma downsides.
 

Drm919

Well-known member
Joined
May 13, 2023
Threads
9
Messages
47
Reaction score
32
Location
NC
Vehicle(s)
2022 Toyota Tacoma SR5
My guess is 20/23 its not moving much
 

MT-Taco

Well-known member
First Name
Allen
Joined
May 22, 2023
Threads
4
Messages
93
Reaction score
82
Location
Montana
Vehicle(s)
2013 Tundra, 2022 Corolla Hybrid, 2022 RAV4 XSE

MT-Taco

Well-known member
First Name
Allen
Joined
May 22, 2023
Threads
4
Messages
93
Reaction score
82
Location
Montana
Vehicle(s)
2013 Tundra, 2022 Corolla Hybrid, 2022 RAV4 XSE
Good to know.... I wonder why it called it out separately as only those states on the information under the grand highlander?
Maybe you just read the Hybrid component warranty 8 years 100,000 miles?
 

JLD94

Well-known member
First Name
JD
Joined
Jan 13, 2022
Threads
22
Messages
311
Reaction score
157
Location
Tx
Vehicle(s)
2013 Honda Accord, 2014 Nissan Rogue
Maybe you just read the Hybrid component warranty 8 years 100,000 miles?
Nope it specifically says battery copied and pasted from Toyota's site.
Sponsored

 
 


Top