- First Name
- Chris
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2025
- Threads
- 5
- Messages
- 25
- Reaction score
- 58
- Location
- San Diego, CA
- Vehicle(s)
- 2025 Toyota Tacoma TRD Off Road Long Bed Ice Cap
- Thread starter
- #1
Falcon 3.2 Fast Adjust Shocks Review
Of all the mods you can do to your truck – shocks stand out as the one that’s better to do right the first time. I wish more people had written reviews like this while I was searching for my next set of shocks, so here's my subjective review of the Falcon 3.2 Fast Adjust front and rear shocks for the 4th generation Tacoma.
What I’m comparing it to:
I can only compare to what I know, so I’ll be comparing it to my experience on previous builds and the stock TRD off road bilsteins. Previous vehicles: Chevy s10 on rough country, 2nd gen 4runner on bilstein 5100, 1st gen tundra on bilstein 5100 then king 2.5 IFP, 4th gen 4runner on bilstein 5100 then fox 2.0, 2nd gen tacoma on Fox Factory 2.5 w/ resis, 1st gen tacoma on fox 2.0, Ford 350 SRW on King 2.5 w/ adjusters.
Things to know about the truck:
2025 Toyota Tacoma TRD Off Road Long Bed. I’m carrying about 600-700lb of extra weight, most of it over the rear axle with a fiberglass shell, sleeping platform, rock sliders, roof rack, water tank and a bunch of other crap. The tires are 285/70r17 Goodyear Duratrac RT load range E - 35 PSI on the road and 15-20ish off road. Front sway bar is on with stock upper control arms. Alldogs offroad medium rate springs in the rear.
What I didn’t like about the stock TRD Off-Road red Bilsteins:
Let me start by saying that they’re great for what they are, and they have a good off road tune for cruising dirt roads and uneven terrain. The ESCV technology is pretty cool and seems to help dampen bottom and top outs. But, they aren’t good for high speeds or carrying loads. They clearly aren’t valved for the extra weight I’m carrying and I think that’s where I was most wanting for more. The damping in the rear felt completely empty through the middle travel range of the shock and there was an uncontrolled bounce from hitting anything over 30mph, even and maybe especially on the highway. It was so over sprung with the Alldogs springs that is was almost dangerous. I also like to drive decently fast off road – first, because it’s more fun that way - second, because I’m often trying to cover long distances on dirt/sand in the Southwest US over my 2-day weekend, and I want to get where I’m trying to go.
Installation:
They have a great installation video and it’s pretty straightforward if you’re used to wrenching on your car and have all the right tools. I did it in the driveway over a weekend by myself.
Lift:
About 1.5-1.75 inches of lift in front and 1 inch longer shock travel both front and rear. You do not need aftermarket upper control arms, diff drop, needle bearing replacement, or extended sway bar links. It’s a great plug-and-play performance upgrade, but if your goal is to achieve max lift, the Falcons are not the right option for that.
On Road:
There is ever so slightly more feedback from the road when you’re going below 20mph compared to stock. You feel a little bit more of the potholes and cracks. But something happens when you hit 20mph, and the suspension changes to riding really plush and smooth. That “plushness” translates to a little extra give/sway when you hit a g-out or when cornering that’s not quite as firm and controlled as it could be, but it’s leagues better than the stock bilsteins. Fox 2.5, King 2.5 and bilstein 5100 all corner better than the Falcons, but Falcons are better than Fox 2.0. Falcons recover from a G out better than bilstein 5100 and Fox 2.0, but not quite as well as Fox 2.5 and King 2.5. Overall, it’s a comfy, controlled on-road ride with ever-slightly more small bump feedback at lower speeds.
Weight handling:
This is where I think the Falcons outcompete other options in their price point. They would be a great option for someone carrying a camper. Adjuster level 3 rides like my F350 on Kings in the rear which is exactly what I want out my mid-size, coil-sprung truck if I’m carrying a load. For my +-600lb, I go back and forth between levels 2 and 3. I’m on 2 pretty much all the time except I’m hitting it hard in the desert. Let me put it this way – on a scale of 1 to 10, one being 1970s Cadillac, ten being race car stiff. I think the stock Bilsteins are a 5. The Falcon rears on adjuster level one are a 6, level two is a 7, and level three is an 8. Most 2.0 and 2.5 oem replacement shocks without adjusters are valved for stock weight vehicles. It’s not that they’re bad by any means; they’re just not valved for carrying heavy loads. That’s where adjusters come in. I think adjusters are crucial for weight damping unless you get a shock that’s specifically valved for it. The rears still had that uncontrolled jounce until I turned it up to levels 2 and 3. Those carrying campers would probably want to keep it on 3 all the time.
Chatter/washboard:
Kind of stiff below 20mph, then it smooths out and gets very comfortable and controlled as you go faster. With the right speed and tires aired down, these can make decent sized washboard completely disappear. I would give it a 9.5/10 high-speed washboard performance – it’s very good! On the flip side, if you’re hitting rocky trail chatter big enough that you can’t go 20mph, the Falcons are a little stiff. Kings, Fox 2.0, and the stock Bilsteins have better low speed chatter absorption, but the Falcons are better than Fox 2.5 and Bilstein 5100. The Falcons prefer to go fast and if you spend a lot of time in 4LO, this probably isn’t the ideal shock for you. One thing to note is that turning the adjusters up in the rear had close to no negative impact on small bump compliance, which I was pleasantly surprised by.
Rocks:
Again, low speed chatter absorption is a little stiff. It’s not terrible, but there are other options that will smooth out a rocky trail better. It’s good for climbing on big rocks though - they have a comfortable give when you come off the rock then settle quickly. But the front does top out pretty hard if you come off faster than you meant to. The spring top-out damper is better than the stock bilstein’s ESCV, but I think a hydraulic top out like on the OME mt64 would be even better. The articulation out of the rear is not much improved over stock, but it is in the front - the front tucks up in the wheel well quite well for a lifted IFS with the sway bar on.
High Speed Desert:
This isn’t a desert racing shock, and it’s not going to skip over whoops smoothly with bottomless suspension. With that said - it’s a really fun ride! I got air a few times on these when I got overly confident and some bigger whoops came out of nowhere. It’s not great, but the Falcons handled it - and it felt like I never completely bottomed out the fronts which I was very impressed by. The rears do bottom out and could use a progressive bump stop, but the foam bump stops up front do a really great job. You can skip over bumps and let the suspension eat underneath as long as you stay within the suspension’s travel, which says a lot about how good the valving is. But front wheel travel is the limiting factor, and that’s where you’ll see the biggest difference between the Falcon kit and other 2.5 shocks with extended travel. The rear is fantastic, however, especially adjusted to level 3 and punches well above its “weight.” I’ll be adding Timbren progressive bump stops next, and I think the rear will absolutely cook. Overall, the Falcons prefer to run fast - and they give you the confidence to do it. Which means at some point a bump or dip will come up in front of you that you don’t have time to break for. The Falcons have your back when it’s time to commit - but it’s not the kind of shock that you voluntarily want to get air with, and it’s not going to eat whoops for breakfast.
Conclusion:
The Falcons fit in a cool category. You don’t have to run after-market upper control arms, so they slot into the price range that’s above all the 2.0 shocks and below all the 2.5s with resis. I think the closest comparables out there are Bilstein 6100 series and Old Man Emu MT64s, with Falcon sitting right in between them. But what sets them apart is the ability to adjust the rear shocks. It’s a game changer for carrying weight at this price point. With that in mind, when it comes to their overall performance, the Falcon 3.2s are closer to 2.5s with resis than they are to 2.0s. Let me put it this way – if you’re pushing the limit of the Falcons, you’ve accepted that this is an off-road rig, and you probably spend a decent amount of time breaking things anyway. On the opposite end of that, if you’re hitting the desert for extended periods, you’ll want something with more damping, bottom and top out control, and cooling. You will not be keeping up the Raptor guys in baja and the Falcons are not comfortable with getting air. So, who are they for? First - anyone carrying weight. The rear adjusters are meant for that, and they work. Second - anyone willing to spend a little more and put up with race maintenance intervals for a performance shock, but you’re not jumping your truck and smashing whoops in the desert.
Of all the mods you can do to your truck – shocks stand out as the one that’s better to do right the first time. I wish more people had written reviews like this while I was searching for my next set of shocks, so here's my subjective review of the Falcon 3.2 Fast Adjust front and rear shocks for the 4th generation Tacoma.
What I’m comparing it to:
I can only compare to what I know, so I’ll be comparing it to my experience on previous builds and the stock TRD off road bilsteins. Previous vehicles: Chevy s10 on rough country, 2nd gen 4runner on bilstein 5100, 1st gen tundra on bilstein 5100 then king 2.5 IFP, 4th gen 4runner on bilstein 5100 then fox 2.0, 2nd gen tacoma on Fox Factory 2.5 w/ resis, 1st gen tacoma on fox 2.0, Ford 350 SRW on King 2.5 w/ adjusters.
Things to know about the truck:
2025 Toyota Tacoma TRD Off Road Long Bed. I’m carrying about 600-700lb of extra weight, most of it over the rear axle with a fiberglass shell, sleeping platform, rock sliders, roof rack, water tank and a bunch of other crap. The tires are 285/70r17 Goodyear Duratrac RT load range E - 35 PSI on the road and 15-20ish off road. Front sway bar is on with stock upper control arms. Alldogs offroad medium rate springs in the rear.
What I didn’t like about the stock TRD Off-Road red Bilsteins:
Let me start by saying that they’re great for what they are, and they have a good off road tune for cruising dirt roads and uneven terrain. The ESCV technology is pretty cool and seems to help dampen bottom and top outs. But, they aren’t good for high speeds or carrying loads. They clearly aren’t valved for the extra weight I’m carrying and I think that’s where I was most wanting for more. The damping in the rear felt completely empty through the middle travel range of the shock and there was an uncontrolled bounce from hitting anything over 30mph, even and maybe especially on the highway. It was so over sprung with the Alldogs springs that is was almost dangerous. I also like to drive decently fast off road – first, because it’s more fun that way - second, because I’m often trying to cover long distances on dirt/sand in the Southwest US over my 2-day weekend, and I want to get where I’m trying to go.
Installation:
They have a great installation video and it’s pretty straightforward if you’re used to wrenching on your car and have all the right tools. I did it in the driveway over a weekend by myself.
Lift:
About 1.5-1.75 inches of lift in front and 1 inch longer shock travel both front and rear. You do not need aftermarket upper control arms, diff drop, needle bearing replacement, or extended sway bar links. It’s a great plug-and-play performance upgrade, but if your goal is to achieve max lift, the Falcons are not the right option for that.
On Road:
There is ever so slightly more feedback from the road when you’re going below 20mph compared to stock. You feel a little bit more of the potholes and cracks. But something happens when you hit 20mph, and the suspension changes to riding really plush and smooth. That “plushness” translates to a little extra give/sway when you hit a g-out or when cornering that’s not quite as firm and controlled as it could be, but it’s leagues better than the stock bilsteins. Fox 2.5, King 2.5 and bilstein 5100 all corner better than the Falcons, but Falcons are better than Fox 2.0. Falcons recover from a G out better than bilstein 5100 and Fox 2.0, but not quite as well as Fox 2.5 and King 2.5. Overall, it’s a comfy, controlled on-road ride with ever-slightly more small bump feedback at lower speeds.
Weight handling:
This is where I think the Falcons outcompete other options in their price point. They would be a great option for someone carrying a camper. Adjuster level 3 rides like my F350 on Kings in the rear which is exactly what I want out my mid-size, coil-sprung truck if I’m carrying a load. For my +-600lb, I go back and forth between levels 2 and 3. I’m on 2 pretty much all the time except I’m hitting it hard in the desert. Let me put it this way – on a scale of 1 to 10, one being 1970s Cadillac, ten being race car stiff. I think the stock Bilsteins are a 5. The Falcon rears on adjuster level one are a 6, level two is a 7, and level three is an 8. Most 2.0 and 2.5 oem replacement shocks without adjusters are valved for stock weight vehicles. It’s not that they’re bad by any means; they’re just not valved for carrying heavy loads. That’s where adjusters come in. I think adjusters are crucial for weight damping unless you get a shock that’s specifically valved for it. The rears still had that uncontrolled jounce until I turned it up to levels 2 and 3. Those carrying campers would probably want to keep it on 3 all the time.
Chatter/washboard:
Kind of stiff below 20mph, then it smooths out and gets very comfortable and controlled as you go faster. With the right speed and tires aired down, these can make decent sized washboard completely disappear. I would give it a 9.5/10 high-speed washboard performance – it’s very good! On the flip side, if you’re hitting rocky trail chatter big enough that you can’t go 20mph, the Falcons are a little stiff. Kings, Fox 2.0, and the stock Bilsteins have better low speed chatter absorption, but the Falcons are better than Fox 2.5 and Bilstein 5100. The Falcons prefer to go fast and if you spend a lot of time in 4LO, this probably isn’t the ideal shock for you. One thing to note is that turning the adjusters up in the rear had close to no negative impact on small bump compliance, which I was pleasantly surprised by.
Rocks:
Again, low speed chatter absorption is a little stiff. It’s not terrible, but there are other options that will smooth out a rocky trail better. It’s good for climbing on big rocks though - they have a comfortable give when you come off the rock then settle quickly. But the front does top out pretty hard if you come off faster than you meant to. The spring top-out damper is better than the stock bilstein’s ESCV, but I think a hydraulic top out like on the OME mt64 would be even better. The articulation out of the rear is not much improved over stock, but it is in the front - the front tucks up in the wheel well quite well for a lifted IFS with the sway bar on.
High Speed Desert:
This isn’t a desert racing shock, and it’s not going to skip over whoops smoothly with bottomless suspension. With that said - it’s a really fun ride! I got air a few times on these when I got overly confident and some bigger whoops came out of nowhere. It’s not great, but the Falcons handled it - and it felt like I never completely bottomed out the fronts which I was very impressed by. The rears do bottom out and could use a progressive bump stop, but the foam bump stops up front do a really great job. You can skip over bumps and let the suspension eat underneath as long as you stay within the suspension’s travel, which says a lot about how good the valving is. But front wheel travel is the limiting factor, and that’s where you’ll see the biggest difference between the Falcon kit and other 2.5 shocks with extended travel. The rear is fantastic, however, especially adjusted to level 3 and punches well above its “weight.” I’ll be adding Timbren progressive bump stops next, and I think the rear will absolutely cook. Overall, the Falcons prefer to run fast - and they give you the confidence to do it. Which means at some point a bump or dip will come up in front of you that you don’t have time to break for. The Falcons have your back when it’s time to commit - but it’s not the kind of shock that you voluntarily want to get air with, and it’s not going to eat whoops for breakfast.
Conclusion:
The Falcons fit in a cool category. You don’t have to run after-market upper control arms, so they slot into the price range that’s above all the 2.0 shocks and below all the 2.5s with resis. I think the closest comparables out there are Bilstein 6100 series and Old Man Emu MT64s, with Falcon sitting right in between them. But what sets them apart is the ability to adjust the rear shocks. It’s a game changer for carrying weight at this price point. With that in mind, when it comes to their overall performance, the Falcon 3.2s are closer to 2.5s with resis than they are to 2.0s. Let me put it this way – if you’re pushing the limit of the Falcons, you’ve accepted that this is an off-road rig, and you probably spend a decent amount of time breaking things anyway. On the opposite end of that, if you’re hitting the desert for extended periods, you’ll want something with more damping, bottom and top out control, and cooling. You will not be keeping up the Raptor guys in baja and the Falcons are not comfortable with getting air. So, who are they for? First - anyone carrying weight. The rear adjusters are meant for that, and they work. Second - anyone willing to spend a little more and put up with race maintenance intervals for a performance shock, but you’re not jumping your truck and smashing whoops in the desert.
Sponsored
Last edited:
