Sponsored

izzy

SR
Well-known member
Joined
Jun 6, 2025
Threads
5
Messages
137
Reaction score
140
Location
Bay Area
Vehicle(s)
2025 Tacoma SR 4x4 DCSB Underground
Skinny tire is the way.

I'm going from 265/70/17 to 255/75/17, true 32 and slightly more narrow. Once these BFGs are more cooked :sunglasses:

Still not that skinny to be honest. Tread width is still 10" which is pretty wide.
 

TrailAdventurer

Trailhunter
Well-known member
First Name
JT
Joined
Apr 19, 2025
Threads
4
Messages
49
Reaction score
52
Location
Canton, MI
Vehicle(s)
2025 Toyota Tacoma Trailhunter, 2015 Jeep Wrangler Rubicon
I've enjoyed both of those. Both producers created good content to pursue an answer. I particularly liked how they both collaborated. Touch of class.
 

Yotota

TRD Off-Road Premium
Well-known member
First Name
Zane
Joined
Oct 10, 2024
Threads
1
Messages
100
Reaction score
120
Location
SW WA
Vehicle(s)
24 TRD
I've seen both videos. Neither one actually tests the tires in real conditions.

Tire width affects the feel and performance for daily driving, snow, sand, mud, rocks, and... Everything. And I'm not just talking about the carcass width - tread width has an even larger impact.

Load rating also plays into this significantly on light trucks like Toyotas since most skinny tires are dually truck tires, and are therefore E-Rated (which are too stiff to perform as designed on a 5000lb midsize truck).

On Toyotas, I've driven tires from 235mm wide with a 7.5" tread width, up to 13.5" wide with a solid 13.5" tread width. "Skinny" tires (235-255mm carcass width) have some marginal benefits in certain conditions but at the expense of road feel, road handling & performance, comfort, mud performance, deep snow performance, and more. I'll never go back to skinny tires.
 

tacorancher

Trailhunter
Well-known member
First Name
k
Joined
Sep 1, 2024
Threads
40
Messages
1,279
Reaction score
1,513
Location
houston
Vehicle(s)
tacoma TH
I've seen both videos. Neither one actually tests the tires in real conditions.

Tire width affects the feel and performance for daily driving, snow, sand, mud, rocks, and... Everything. And I'm not just talking about the carcass width - tread width has an even larger impact.

Load rating also plays into this significantly on light trucks like Toyotas since most skinny tires are dually truck tires, and are therefore E-Rated (which are too stiff to perform as designed on a 5000lb midsize truck).

On Toyotas, I've driven tires from 235mm wide with a 7.5" tread width, up to 13.5" wide with a solid 13.5" tread width. "Skinny" tires (235-255mm carcass width) have some marginal benefits in certain conditions but at the expense of road feel, road handling & performance, comfort, mud performance, deep snow performance, and more. I'll never go back to skinny tires.

Finally the counterpoint that I’ve been unable to articulate — I’ll also say that wet weather driving - which we’ve got a ton of in south Texas - is WAY superior with wider tires. Wider tires are also better if you DO NOT plan to air down all the time off-road - I love my 285s including how they look
 

Sponsored

Briscoelab

Trailhunter
Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2025
Threads
1
Messages
22
Reaction score
6
Location
MN
Vehicle(s)
25 Tacoma Trailhunter, 25 LC250
I've always been a big proponent of skinny for a given height. But not necessarily just full skinny over everything else. Too far of an extreme will definitely impact on road feel and handling.

285/70/r17 is as wide as I'd go for a ~"33" and they are a really nice mix for most situations. But I've found that rough width is better suited for a 34-35" tire. Way back in the past I've used 235/80r16, 255/85R16 or 255/80R17... all with good results. These are on the skinnier size range, but the 33" size does work well in the 255 width for 16" and 17" wheels.

35x11r17 AT4W, load C, have been my fav all around tire. But the various 285/75R17 are great too. I even tried the very skinny (for 35" size) 255/85R17 mickey Thomson Baja Boss AT. Those were amazing off-road and in the snow. But a bit suboptimal on the road. (they also wore funny and got loud, which soured me a bit).

If on 18" wheels, the 275/70R18 is a great option and taller than the common 285/70R17. Moving up a notch, the 285/70 and 285/75R18s are both a great balance for the 18" wheel if you're looking for a 34 or 35.

I have never enjoyed the ubiquitous 315 width (or 12.5") "35" options, despite trying lots. Never enjoyed the road feel, rain performance wasn't great, and they just looked too wide (to me) for the height. Reminded me too much of the old "true" 33x12.5R15 look.

Moving up from there, 37" tires have always worked best (for me) at a 12.5" size.They also looked proportional. But I'd definitely give an 11.5" a try if one existed. I've only used this size class of tire (or larger) in wheel sizes up to a 17".

Last thought centers around various Toyota powertrains I've experienced really seeming to prefer a skinnier tire, despite what the torque/HP numbers might suggest. (Various Tacomas, including the hybrid 4th gen, LC250, and even 70 series I've driven outside of the country... especially if those had the 1HZ tractor motor:cwl:).
 

tacorancher

Trailhunter
Well-known member
First Name
k
Joined
Sep 1, 2024
Threads
40
Messages
1,279
Reaction score
1,513
Location
houston
Vehicle(s)
tacoma TH
I've always been a big proponent of skinny for a given height. But not necessarily just full skinny over everything else. Too far of an extreme will definitely impact on road feel and handling.

285/70/r17 is as wide as I'd go for a ~"33" and they are a really nice mix for most situations. But I've found that rough width is better suited for a 34-35" tire. Way back in the past I've used 235/80r16, 255/85R16 or 255/80R17... all with good results. These are on the skinnier size range, but the 33" size does work well in the 255 width for 16" and 17" wheels.

35x11r17 AT4W, load C, have been my fav all around tire. But the various 285/75R17 are great too. I even tried the very skinny (for 35" size) 255/85R17 mickey Thomson Baja Boss AT. Those were amazing off-road and in the snow. But a bit suboptimal on the road. (they also wore funny and got loud, which soured me a bit).

If on 18" wheels, the 275/70R18 is a great option and taller than the common 285/70R17. Moving up a notch, the 285/70 and 285/75R18s are both a great balance for the 18" wheel if you're looking for a 34 or 35.

I have never enjoyed the ubiquitous 315 width (or 12.5") "35" options, despite trying lots. Never enjoyed the road feel, rain performance wasn't great, and they just looked too wide (to me) for the height. Reminded me too much of the old "true" 33x12.5R15 look.

Moving up from there, 37" tires have always worked best (for me) at a 12.5" size.They also looked proportional. But I'd definitely give an 11.5" a try if one existed. I've only used this size class of tire (or larger) in wheel sizes up to a 17".

Last thought centers around various Toyota powertrains I've experienced really seeming to prefer a skinnier tire, despite what the torque/HP numbers might suggest. (Various Tacomas, including the hybrid 4th gen, LC250, and even 70 series I've driven outside of the country... especially if those had the 1HZ tractor motor:cwl:).

Well said. Agreed on all counts. 275/70/18 is indeed a great size for 18” wheels but one should try to find them in 33.4” versus the more common 33.2” diameter.
Sponsored

 
 






Top