- First Name
- Will
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2025
- Threads
- 2
- Messages
- 332
- Reaction score
- 308
- Location
- Quad Cities
- Vehicle(s)
- 2025 TRD OR
- Thread starter
- #1
Haven't seen it posted yet, so I figured Id toss it up. I was surprised that a crowd favorite the Falken AT4W scored so poorly, and hes tested another favorite the Toyo several times resulting in also having poor results to the point it didn't even make this round of testing (he stated so in the comments). He also apparently couldn't get his hands on a set of Bajas in time to start the test.
Definitely one of the better testing criteria I've seen with a much more scientific and consistent basis for all testing. I was surprised a Perelli won overall. I really would have liked to see the Bajas.
Comparison Review:
https://www.tyrereviews.com/Tyre-Tests/Best-All-Terrain-Tyres-2026-Test.htm
Video:
AI summary:
This comprehensive review by Tyre Reviews spans a year of testing across Northern Europe (snow/ice), Central Europe (dry/wet), and Utah (off-road dirt handling). The test evaluates six of the newest, most aggressive all-terrain (AT) tires, one budget mild-AT tire, and a standard all-season tire as a reference point.
The test vehicle used is a Ford Ranger Raptor, mostly evaluated in rear-wheel-drive (RWD) mode to push the tires to their limits.
1. Dirt Handling & Off-Road Testing
Tested on a mix of rocky, smooth, and fluffy dirt surfaces in Utah.
2. Wet Performance & Braking
Wet handling was tested on a 2-minute lap. Wet braking and hydroplaning resistance were measured objectively.
3. On-Road Comfort, Noise & NVH
Evaluated over a full day of driving across varying pavement types in Utah.
4. Snow Performance
A brief overview ahead of a full upcoming winter test video.
Final Standings & Summary
PositionTire ModelKey StrengthsKey WeaknessesFinal Verdict1st PlacePirelli Scorpion All Terrain Plus (XTM AT/AT80)
Definitely one of the better testing criteria I've seen with a much more scientific and consistent basis for all testing. I was surprised a Perelli won overall. I really would have liked to see the Bajas.
Comparison Review:
https://www.tyrereviews.com/Tyre-Tests/Best-All-Terrain-Tyres-2026-Test.htm
Video:
AI summary:
This comprehensive review by Tyre Reviews spans a year of testing across Northern Europe (snow/ice), Central Europe (dry/wet), and Utah (off-road dirt handling). The test evaluates six of the newest, most aggressive all-terrain (AT) tires, one budget mild-AT tire, and a standard all-season tire as a reference point.
The test vehicle used is a Ford Ranger Raptor, mostly evaluated in rear-wheel-drive (RWD) mode to push the tires to their limits.
1. Dirt Handling & Off-Road Testing
Tested on a mix of rocky, smooth, and fluffy dirt surfaces in Utah.
- Pirelli Scorpion All Terrain Plus (XTM AT/AT80): The top performer alongside the Nokian. Easiest, most predictable drive with a well-balanced grip circle.
- Nokian Outpost NAT: Matched the Pirelli for the best subjective driving feel; excellent carcass compliance over bumps and great bite in loose fluff.
- BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO3: Highly impressive. Even though it's a stiff, heavy tire, its carcass was incredibly compliant in the ruts. It performs slightly better under straight-line braking and acceleration than it does while turning.
- Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac RT & Falken Wildpeak A/T4W: Both offered good mechanical grip, but their stiff carcasses caused them to struggle and bounce when hitting heavy ruts. The Falken suffered from noticeable understeer.
- Nitto Recon Grappler: Had decent straight-line braking grip, but very poor lateral (side-to-side) grip. The rear end would step out rapidly and unpredictably on throttle.
- Westlake SL369 (Budget/Mild AT): The most difficult tire on the dirt track. It had decent rubber compound grip on smooth sections, but its weak carcass provided zero stability through rough ruts.
- Pirelli Scorpion AS+ 3 (Reference All-Season): Performed surprisingly well on hard-packed dirt because its lighter weight and compliant carcass didn't have to account for extreme puncture resistance. However, it struggled to recover once sliding and would fail completely in deep mud.
2. Wet Performance & Braking
Wet handling was tested on a 2-minute lap. Wet braking and hydroplaning resistance were measured objectively.
- Pirelli Scorpion XTM AT: The absolute standout. It was an astonishing 5 seconds faster per lap than the Westlake and roughly 10 seconds faster than its premium rivals. It transformed the truck's dynamics, offering immense traction, crisp steering response, and top-tier wet braking.
- Westlake SL369: The surprise runner-up in the wet. Because its design is biased toward on-road driving (milder tread), it cleared water effectively and felt sharp on the brakes.
- Nokian Outpost NAT: The fastest of the remaining premium pack. It resisted terminal understeer and allowed the driver to rotate the truck smoothly using the throttle. It also won the hydroplaning resistance test.
- BFGoodrich KO3: Excelled at straight-line wet braking but heavily disliked cornering, exhibiting continuous, safe (but slow) understeer.
- Goodyear Duratrac RT: Felt "industrial" and required a lot of steering input. It had a wide recovery window but lacked structural sharpness.
- Falken A/T4W & Nitto Recon Grappler: Finished at the bottom. Both suffered from low grip, poor braking, and a "peaky" rear end that would suddenly snap into oversteer.
3. On-Road Comfort, Noise & NVH
Evaluated over a full day of driving across varying pavement types in Utah.
- Nokian Outpost NAT: The biggest surprise on the road. While it didn't strictly dominate one single area, it combined steering sharpness, low noise, and excellent ride damping perfectly, making it the host's top recommendation for a daily driver.
- BFGoodrich KO3: The most plush and comfortable tire. It rounded off harsh bumps beautifully. However, its steering in this specific size felt sluggish and unpredictable, causing a delayed "two-part turn" reaction between the front and rear axles.
- Pirelli Scorpion XTM AT: Possessed the sharpest, most stable steering and best shoulder stability (feeling like a sports tire), but rode slightly firmer and louder than the BFG.
- Goodyear Duratrac RT & Falken A/T4W: Both felt agricultural and a bit bouncy. The Falken was noticeably loud at highway speeds and suffered from poor damping over bumps.
- Westlake SL369: Noticeable drop-off in refinement. While total volume wasn't terribly high, it emitted an annoying high-pitched pitch reminiscent of a failing wheel bearing and held onto vibrations.
- Nitto Recon Grappler: The loudest tire on test. It produced a traditional, prominent all-terrain "hum" at speed that modern premium tires have largely engineered out.
4. Snow Performance
A brief overview ahead of a full upcoming winter test video.
- Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac RT: The objective king of the snow. It produced the fastest handling lap, best braking, and second-best traction.
- Pirelli Scorpion XTM AT & Nokian Outpost NAT: Right on the Goodyear's heels. The Pirelli had slightly better traction but slightly worse braking, while the Nokian was incredibly solid overall.
- BFGoodrich KO3: Very competitive and performed reliably in both 2WD and 4WD configurations.
- Falken A/T4W, Westlake, and Nitto: Considerably behind the pack. The Falken A/T4W was uniquely disappointing, with snow traction sitting 30% lower than the leaders. The host explicitly warns against using it in heavy winter climates.
Final Standings & Summary
PositionTire ModelKey StrengthsKey WeaknessesFinal Verdict1st PlacePirelli Scorpion All Terrain Plus (XTM AT/AT80)
- Dominant wet braking
- Fastest wet & dirt handling laps
- Top-tier snow traction
- Exceptionally sharp steering
- Slightly firmer ride quality
- Slightly more road noise than the softest options
- Best overall balance of manners
- Extremely low road noise
- Superb winter/snow grip
- High hydroplaning resistance
- Slightly longer raw braking distances in dry pavement conditions
- Unmatched plush ride comfort
- Excellent impact damping
- Stellar straight-line braking
- Great compliance in dirt ruts
- Heavy understeer in wet corners
- Sluggish, delayed "two-part" steering response on-road
- Strong wet road braking
- Predictable on-road handling
- Very low retail entry price
- Weak carcass struggles in ruts
- Poor winter snow traction
- Emits an annoying, high-pitched highway drone
- Undisputed king of pure snow
- Fastest snow handling & braking
- Tough, durable carcass in dirt
- Mediocre wet pavement grip
- Unrefined "industrial" handling
- Noticeably bouncy ride quality
- Excellent dry braking metrics
- High tread life and wear resistance
- Terrible snow traction (-30%)
- Heavy understeer in dirt
- Prone to sudden wet oversteer
- Decent straight-line mechanical braking on dry dirt tracks
- Worst wet handling and braking
- Unpredictable, peaky breakaway
- Loud traditional highway hum
Sponsored